)]}'
{
  "commit": "aeb65a2a36257d72a85f57acee2f81b73c38d00a",
  "tree": "cff7ca971795c8877b9c96529296365701645e62",
  "parents": [
    "6eb2a6ad76e9e35637d2ff94b6432e4fb51da28b"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "dan sinclair",
    "email": "dsinclair@chromium.org",
    "time": "Wed Jun 04 15:29:27 2025 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Dawn LUCI CQ",
    "email": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Wed Jun 04 15:29:27 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "[spirv-reader][ir] Fix premerge calculation.\n\nWhen determining the premerge block for an `if` instruction, make sure\nwe don\u0027t select a walk stop block (like a `merge` instruction). This\nblock can\u0027t be a premerge block as it has to come after the `if` merge\nblock itself.\n\nChange-Id: I973fde66cf790d002562dcf19021d35462c8c4f4\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/245335\nCommit-Queue: dan sinclair \u003cdsinclair@chromium.org\u003e\nReviewed-by: James Price \u003cjrprice@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "566c562f9774831322a9d4fe7f4426d12b7687cc",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/spirv/reader/parser/branch_test.cc",
      "new_id": "a0d7b17ef2722b25915d6848c2a82782284b8d3f",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/spirv/reader/parser/branch_test.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7801b9c11221b831a89abf1a5ea68f95a4adcb86",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/spirv/reader/parser/parser.cc",
      "new_id": "fe9c4e81946013a7e57dcfdb38ca5c4aef0aec5d",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/spirv/reader/parser/parser.cc"
    }
  ]
}