)]}'
{
  "commit": "d802df6c21219e4b976fa9f5c462076bfaf3f15b",
  "tree": "5d2ef576436f6b3a69814b56f0661f5483a9716c",
  "parents": [
    "fee00bdbf4d188de71493c3768eb2614db6cc99d"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "James Price",
    "email": "jrprice@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Jun 10 12:27:52 2026 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "email": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Wed Jun 10 12:27:52 2026 -0700"
  },
  "message": "[uniformity] Remove resulting control flow from expressions\n\nExpressions do not modify control flow, so this is an unnecessary\noutput of the expression rules.\n\nRemove the `CF_after` node from function call expressions since the\ncontrol flow is now just the incoming control flow.\n\nAdded a unit test to cover the edge between a function call result and\nthe control flow of the function call expression.\n\nChange-Id: I53d4709a52178ade949cc4e1260d05a2b084899f\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/306035\nReviewed-by: Alan Baker \u003calanbaker@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: James Price \u003cjrprice@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "b1774a606dbc4de4de1b0104f779acd97dfb0d00",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/uniformity.cc",
      "new_id": "7cd269a444aca3541754393a075b47357662f602",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/uniformity.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "87deef0fe235ab420706e8c226b070008149badc",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/uniformity_test.cc",
      "new_id": "8c43f64e987ecd2284171d33c71c4cfeefe9c52c",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/uniformity_test.cc"
    }
  ]
}