)]}'
{
  "commit": "dbeef08e9d1ffc2a51456598fc54bf344ca6078d",
  "tree": "f7eecef49a56cb3236393a92812c5c5843a188c2",
  "parents": [
    "3be36a26b85688530821ea28e31c003672b2a32b"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "James Price",
    "email": "jrprice@google.com",
    "time": "Mon Dec 15 17:18:19 2025 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Dawn LUCI CQ",
    "email": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Mon Dec 15 17:18:19 2025 -0800"
  },
  "message": "[ir] Fix validation order for control flow\n\nMake sure we validate blocks nested in control flow before we validate\ninstructions that follow the control flow instruction.\n\nThis fixes an issue where values declared after a control flow\ninstruction were incorrectly seen as in scope inside that control flow\ninstruction.\n\nFixed: 467610939\nChange-Id: I43c88601ff041e084475f17d814858af193a72d5\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/280596\nCommit-Queue: James Price \u003cjrprice@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: dan sinclair \u003cdsinclair@chromium.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "940680474426f21e861e4b18e293c044a7ccf063",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/validator.cc",
      "new_id": "4f11f7a35686714f14f072d0b0c92669cde2722e",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/validator.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "63f0a1544e3b2718897a25516a234033faa7ee16",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/validator_test.cc",
      "new_id": "c9f79933ea2efdfb734dc2abeeb0f3a2c5761789",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/validator_test.cc"
    }
  ]
}