tree 945268e30da086734c43c3ddce060139b3d072c5
parent 328ffe7fbbc04ae41312347d1a9ab6d7a8bfe2dc
author Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> 1707414439 +0000
committer Dawn LUCI CQ <dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> 1707414439 +0000

[tint] Improve TINT_ASSERT_ALL_FIELDS_REFLECTED()

Field and class alignment could result in false positives.

Migrate the assertion from a compile-time static assertion, to a google-test ASSERT_EQ().
This allows the test to check the individual field offsets, which results in a more accurate detection of missing fields.

Note: There is still an unavoidable false-negative if the class has an alignment that hides a missing tail field.
Change-Id: Ia284cc1d1220b51e2805d42e22dda2dfeff93b6f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/173960
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>