)]}'
{
  "commit": "d717c21fee78c1d1f1ac4a64d4d862d87b6e5243",
  "tree": "0d9580f99f42afedb90037b71b9b855da79eeabf",
  "parents": [
    "0f564615a6497ba43c9158df5d9125284d9bda88"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Jiawei Shao",
    "email": "jiawei.shao@intel.com",
    "time": "Sun Apr 20 20:30:53 2025 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Dawn LUCI CQ",
    "email": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Sun Apr 20 20:30:53 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Range Analysis: Compute the range of loop control variable - Part II\n\nThis patch implements the range analysis on the loop control variable\nof a simple for-loop when the for-loop matches the below pattern:\n\n```\n// The range of i is [const_value, const_rhs - 1]\nfor (var i \u003d const_value; i \u003c const_rhs; i++)\n\n// The range of i is [const_rhs + 1, const_value]\nfor (var i \u003d const_value; i \u003e const_rhs; i--)\n```\n\nBug: 348701956\nTest: tint_unittests\nChange-Id: I7820cf4b1394f1d38b2f47fa428a8ef5ab04d02c\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/236994\nCommit-Queue: Jiawei Shao \u003cjiawei.shao@intel.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: James Price \u003cjrprice@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "94f06aaddca1bd41e6e1db2d272369f03ec7329c",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/analysis/integer_range_analysis.cc",
      "new_id": "19841acbc1504f37955358591574938ffeace279",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/analysis/integer_range_analysis.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "039eb6ab1a0451bcab7557c022883d19eba8ef1f",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/analysis/integer_range_analysis_test.cc",
      "new_id": "6ecd887bededcedbc79c35f7c82e60506f448fa7",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/core/ir/analysis/integer_range_analysis_test.cc"
    }
  ]
}