)]}'
{
  "commit": "2cf55118bc3ece7f0235b5895a3581520c5df79a",
  "tree": "75f2efc8f959415d2c40d21980b52940f754f7a7",
  "parents": [
    "79acfe7b8c4f101cae4f91e19941983ac9c63911"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Natalie Chouinard",
    "email": "chouinard@google.com",
    "time": "Mon Feb 02 13:11:27 2026 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Dawn LUCI CQ",
    "email": "dawn-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Mon Feb 02 13:11:27 2026 -0800"
  },
  "message": "[tint] Fix swizzle view bug in compound assigns\n\nWhen the rhs of a compound assignment is a swizzle view, the intrinsic\ntable lookup fails. Fix this by explicitly unwrapping it for now, but\nwe could consider a follow up to clean these cases up in the resolver.\n\nCTS test that covers this bug to follow.\n\nBug: 480933709\nChange-Id: I596ce62ee1e2fc05e0b6f5f15ed95e9d7d9e8c5a\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/288435\nReviewed-by: dan sinclair \u003cdsinclair@chromium.org\u003e\nCommit-Queue: Natalie Chouinard \u003cchouinard@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: James Price \u003cjrprice@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "132ef50f1b972925d480151b66991a286a258f64",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/compound_assignment_validation_test.cc",
      "new_id": "09749d2b71508f244e8a47b55768c52496f5bede",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/compound_assignment_validation_test.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "d6bee1c1ada6f23476134d76d52123cf139e711d",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/resolver.cc",
      "new_id": "3b83f94581cc79e8e8bbadcee5ebcb2fa2c32a55",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/tint/lang/wgsl/resolver/resolver.cc"
    }
  ]
}