)]}'
{
  "commit": "4e848d76d00bf407c21eaaad75b1c61bb3f23557",
  "tree": "267d9cd642af722a6ff2505cddaaeb77b7aa9417",
  "parents": [
    "5102f87e38e0092828664b0208e5398781e8686e"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Antonio Maiorano",
    "email": "amaiorano@google.com",
    "time": "Thu May 27 15:57:57 2021 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Tint LUCI CQ",
    "email": "tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Thu May 27 15:57:57 2021 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Simplify Expr_Binary_Test_Invalid\n\nPrevious logic relied on the fact that for most operations, for a given\nlhs type, there was exactly one rhs type allowed, except for\nmultiplication. This is no longer true in the spec, so making this test\nwork is more complex now. Instead, we simplify the test by having it\ntake the cartesian product of all possible (type * type * op), and\nskipping any triplet not found in the all_valid_cases table.\n\nBug: tint:376\nChange-Id: Icc76158823630e34dc8f25dfb0a0827545693108\nReviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/52322\nKokoro: Kokoro \u003cnoreply+kokoro@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Ben Clayton \u003cbclayton@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano \u003camaiorano@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "1645aaba1ed55953df7a2c429636ea18960fa731",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "src/resolver/resolver_test.cc",
      "new_id": "7a088c775dbca05fde1dd4e1bc015fbffb2e5892",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "src/resolver/resolver_test.cc"
    }
  ]
}
