Fix linter complaint
But I liked the comment where it was.
I think the linter was wrong, but it doesn't like my argument.
Change-Id: Ie3bb6e2b4bd08fae6d72a076622b1e74f517f23c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50680
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
diff --git a/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc b/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
index 2052a7a..b67fae5 100644
--- a/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
+++ b/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
@@ -3622,6 +3622,9 @@
// SPIR-V requires a Sample image operand when operating on a
// multisampled image.
+ // ImageFetch arrayed
+ // Not in WebGPU
+
// ImageFetch non-arrayed
{"%float 2D 0 0 1 1 Unknown",
"%99 = OpImageFetch %v4float %im %vi12 Sample %i1",
@@ -3650,9 +3653,7 @@
}
}
}
- })"}} // ImageFetch arrayed
- // Not in WebGPU
- ));
+ })"}}));
INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(
ImageFetch_Multisampled_ConvertSampleOperand,