Fix linter complaint

But I liked the comment where it was.
I think the linter was wrong, but it doesn't like my argument.

Change-Id: Ie3bb6e2b4bd08fae6d72a076622b1e74f517f23c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50680
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
diff --git a/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc b/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
index 2052a7a..b67fae5 100644
--- a/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
+++ b/src/reader/spirv/parser_impl_handle_test.cc
@@ -3622,6 +3622,9 @@
         // SPIR-V requires a Sample image operand when operating on a
         // multisampled image.
 
+        // ImageFetch arrayed
+        // Not in WebGPU
+
         // ImageFetch non-arrayed
         {"%float 2D 0 0 1 1 Unknown",
          "%99 = OpImageFetch %v4float %im %vi12 Sample %i1",
@@ -3650,9 +3653,7 @@
           }
         }
       }
-    })"}}  // ImageFetch arrayed
-                        // Not in WebGPU
-                        ));
+    })"}}));
 
 INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(
     ImageFetch_Multisampled_ConvertSampleOperand,